Retweeting and sharing may be interfering with learning and memory



Related Articles

The digital world has given us access to vast amount of information. But are we retaining any of it? Are we learning anything from it? It turns out, we may not be.

The nature of social media is to retweet or otherwise share anything and everything from news articles and blog posts to photos and memes. According to research conducted at Cornell University and Beijing University, however, doing so can create "cognitive overload," which interferes with learning and retaining what you've just seen.

Worse yet, that overload can spill over and diminish performance in the real world.

"Most people don't post original ideas any more. You just share what you read with your friends," said Qi Wang, professor of human development in the College of Human Ecology at Cornell University. "But they don't realize that sharing has a downside. It may interfere with other things we do."

Wang and colleagues in China conducted experiments showing that retweeting interfered with learning and memory, both online and off. The experiments are described in Issue 59 (2016) of the journal Computers in Human Behavior.

The experiments were conducted at Beijing University, with a group of Chinese college students as subjects. At computers in a laboratory setting, two groups were presented with a series of messages from Weibo, the Chinese equivalent of Twitter. After reading each message, members of one group had options either to repost or go on to the next message. The other group was given only the "next" option.

After finishing a series of messages, the students were given an online test on the content of those messages. Those in the repost group offered almost twice as many wrong answers and often demonstrated poor comprehension. What they did remember they often remembered poorly, Wang reported. "For things that they reposted, they remembered especially worse," she added.

The researchers theorized that reposters were suffering from "cognitive overload." When there is a choice to share or not share, the decision itself consumes cognitive resources, Wang explained.

This led to a second experiment: After viewing a series of Weibo messages, the students were given an unrelated paper test on their comprehension of a New Scientist article. Again, participants in the no-feedback group outperformed the reposters. Subjects also completed a Workload Profile Index, in which they were asked to rate the cognitive demands of the message-viewing task. The results confirmed a higher cognitive drain for the repost group.

"The sharing leads to cognitive overload, and that interferes with the subsequent task," Wang said. "In real life when students are surfing online and exchanging information and right after that they go to take a test, they may perform worse," she suggested.

Noting that other research has shown people often pay more attention to elements of a web design such as "repost" or "like" than to the content, the researchers suggest that web interfaces should be designed to promote rather than interfere with cognitive processing. "Online design should be simple and task-relevant," Wang concluded.